thanks
On 02-08-2017 22:50, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Carlos Palminha wrote:
>> Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
>> so make it static.
>>
>> Cleans up sparse warnings:
>> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied with acks from Joao and Jingoo to pci/host-designware for v4.14,
> thanks!
>
> I rewrapped these so they still fit in 80 columns, like the rest of the
> file.
>
>> ---
>> Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
>>
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>> }
>>
>> -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
>> +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
>> u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
>> {
>> u32 retries, val;
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>> }
>>
>> -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
>> +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
>> u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
>> {
>> int type;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
