Hi Carlos,
Às 2:13 PM de 7/17/2017, Carlos Palminha escreveu:
> Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
> so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
>
> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> }
>
> -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
> {
> u32 retries, val;
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> }
>
> -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
> +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
> u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
> {
> int type;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
That indeed escaped in the refactoring :) Thanks!
Acked-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
