On 12 July 2017 at 11:00, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2017 10:13:05 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On UEFI systems, the firmware may expose a Graphics Output Protocol (GOP)
>> instance to which the efifb driver attempts to attach in order to provide
>> a minimal, unaccelerated framebuffer. The GOP protocol itself is not very
>> sophisticated, and only describes the offset and size of the framebuffer
>> in memory, and the pixel format.
>>
>> If the GOP framebuffer is provided by a PCI device, it will have been
>> configured and enabled by the UEFI firmware, and the GOP protocol will
>> simply point into a live BAR region. However, the GOP protocol itself does
>> not describe this relation, and so we have to take care not to reconfigure
>> the BAR without taking efifb's dependency on it into account.
>>
>> Commit 55d728a40d36 ("efi/fb: Avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers
>> the framebuffer") attempted to do so by claiming the BAR resource early
>> on, which prevents the PCI resource allocation routines from changing it.
>> However, it turns out that this only works if the PCI device is not
>> behind any bridges, since the bridge resources need to be claimed first.
>>
>> So instead, allow the BAR to be moved, but make the efifb driver deal
>> with that gracefully. So record the resource that covers the BAR early
>> on, and if it turns out to have moved by the time we probe the efifb
>> driver, update the framebuffer address accordingly.
>>
>> While this is less likely to occur on x86, given that the firmware's
>> PCI resource allocation is more likely to be preserved, this is a
>> worthwhile sanity check to have in place, and so let's remove the
>
> It still cuts the patch description early..
>
Ah yes, thanks for pointing that out. I will fix it up before queuing the patch.
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> From fbdev's side:
>
> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Cheers.
