On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:18:14AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > Hi Oza/Lorenzo, > > On 6/13/17 1:22 AM, Oza Oza wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 6/12/17 10:40 AM, Oza Oza wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > >>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 09:42:34AM +0530, Oza Oza wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > >>>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>> [dropped rock-chips maintainers, email bounces] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 08:56:05AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Lorenzo, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, I'll try my best to find time to test this along 15/42 and > >>>>>>> 33/42 patches. Hopefully I can get to that some time next week. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have not yet reviewed these patches in details. Do they have > >>>>>>> dependency on other patches to the generic framework code you > >>>>>>> changed? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If so, is there a repo I can pull them? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I added it in the cover letter but anyway here it is: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git pci/pci-fixup-irqs-removal-v2 > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Lorenzo, > >>>>> > >>>>> I picked up your changes, and tested on iproc based SOC, > >>>>> and ran basic fio data transfer.. and it looks okay. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you. If you could also check it is all OK from a legacy > >>>> IRQ allocation (ie same as before applying series) I'd be grateful. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I disabled msi and it should default to legacy IRQ, looks like there > >>> is a problem, if I missed any change ! > >>> > >>> before applying series: cat /proc/interrupts > >>> 377: 168 0 0 0 0 0 > >>> 0 0 dummy 1 Edge nvme0q0, nvme0q1 > >>> > >>> after applying series: > >>> root@bcm958742k:~# dmesg | grep nvme > >>> [ 3.855466] nvme 0000:01:00.0: assign irq: got 0 > >>> [ 3.855469] nvme 0000:01:00.0: assigning IRQ 00 > >>> [ 3.855515] nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:01:00.0 > >>> [ 4.270850] nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) > >>> [ 4.276787] nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling bus mastering > >>> [ 4.276817] nvme nvme0: Removing after probe failure status: -22 > >>> > >>> here is my git status of your series, let me know if I am missing any > >>> change with respect to legacy IRQ ? > >>> > >>> modified: arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h > >>> modified: arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/pci.c > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/pci.h > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-mv78xx0/pcie.c > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-orion5x/common.h > >>> modified: arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c > >>> modified: arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > >>> modified: drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/Makefile > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-aardvark.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-ftpci100.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-host-common.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-versatile.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc-bcma.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc-platform.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/probe.c > >>> modified: drivers/pci/setup-irq.c > >>> modified: include/linux/pci.h > >>> > >> > >> Did you test with or without my change in bcm/master to emulate legacy > >> interrupt through dummy IRQ domain? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Ray > >> > >> > > > > Hi Ray, > > yes irqdomain was missing, and with that legacy IRQ are fine now. > > please mainline those changes. > > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > > Legacy IRQ is working fine as well wiht your patches. > > > > cat /proc/interrupts > > 122: 160 0 0 0 0 0 > > 0 0 dummy 1 Edge nvme0q0, nvme0q1 > > > > NVMe data transfer is also fine. > > > > Regards, > > Oza. > > > > Okay, so I take this as Lorenzo's changes on iProc PCIe driver have been > sanity tested for link detection and legacy interrupt support. No > regression is seen. Thanks, Oza. Yes, that's how I take it too, I did not understand what was triggering the first regression reported - my series should work on top of mainline if the current code works and should not depend on any other patch being merged - please make sure that's the case to prevent unwanted regressions in case other patches do not make it into the mainline. Thank you very much for your help in testing it. Lorenzo > > I'll send out the INTx irqdomain support patch when I have time. > > Ray > > > >
