[+linux-pci] On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 01:00:17 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 01:01:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > XXV710 has the same broken INTx behavior as the rest of the X/XL710 > > series, the interrupt status register is not wired to report pending > > INTx interrupts, thus we never associate the interrupt to the device. > > Extend the device IDs to include these so that we hide that the > > device supports INTx at all to the user. > > Is vfio really the right place for the list? Shouldn't this be > keyed off the core PCI quirk for these devices? I sent a separate patch to add these devices to the regular broken INTx quirk in pci-core: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg61971.html We don't currently have a device flag to specify that INTx is broken in this particular way that vfio can work around, nor do I really know how other drivers might make use of this info. If I'm wrong, then certainly let's make a common way to do this, but this patch is just a trivial extension to an existing mechanism. Thanks, Alex
