On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:49:04PM +0200, Mason wrote: > On 31/05/2017 19:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > ... > > This would be more an IRQ patch than a PCI patch, but if I were > > reviewing it, I would look for assurance that *all* the no-op > > .irq_set_affinity callbacks were cleaned up, not just those in > > drivers/pci/host. > > Are you saying the patch is *wrong* if not all "do-nothing" > callbacks are cleaned up? I'm saying that (1) this probably wouldn't be applied via the PCI tree, and (2) if it *were* applied via PCI, I would ask that all the no-op callbacks were cleaned up at the same time. Huh, that sounds a lot like what I wrote above. Was I unclear? Bjorn
