On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 16:47:34 -0600
>
> > Noa Osherovich introduced a series of new Mellanox device ID
> > definitions to help differentiate specific controllers that needed
> > INTx masking quirks [1].
> >
> > Bjorn Helgaas followed on, using the device ID definitions Noa
> > provided to replace hard-coded values within the mxl4 ID table [2].
> >
> > This patch continues along similar lines, adding a few additional
> > Mellanox device ID definitions and converting the net/mlx5e
> > driver's mlx5 ID table to use the defines so tools like 'grep' and
> > 'cscope' can be used to help identify relationships with other
> > aspects (such as INTx masking).
>
> If you're adding pci_ids.h defines, it's only valid to do so if you
> actually use the defines in more than one location.
>
> This patch series is not doing that.
Hi David,
Yes, now that you mention that again I do vaguely remember past
conversations stating similar constraints which is a little odd as
Noa's series did exactly that. It was Bjorn, in a separate patch, that
made the connection to the driver with commit c19e4b9037f
("net/mlx4_core: Use device ID defines") [1] and even after such, some
of the introduced #defines are still currently singular in usage.
Anyway, the part I'm interested in is creating a more transparent
association between the Mellanox controllers that need the INTx masking
quirk and their drivers, something that remains very opaque currently
for a few of the remaining instances (PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_CONNECTIB,
PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_CONNECTX4, and
PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_CONNECTX4_LX).
I'd like to hear back from others as to whether or not there is truly
concern about adding the #defines such as I submitted with singular
usages and if so I can re-submit a more focused patch which would
effectively be the first three substitutions in "[PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5e:
Use device ID defines".
[1] Perhaps Noa's submission had a similar discussion as while it was
a separate series from which Bjorn then made the connection to the
driver, all the patches came in via the same merge commit 25831571419
("Merge branch 'pci/virtualization' into next").
Thanks for your
feedback,
Myron
