Re: [PATCH v3] efifb: avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bjorn,

Many thanks for your clear answer.

Regards,

Gary (Heyi Guo)


在 5/18/2017 10:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
Hi Gary,

Thanks for the question.

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:09:51AM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
Hi Ard,

I have one comment inclined.


在 3/22/2017 11:30 PM, Ard Biesheuvel 写道:
On UEFI systems, the PCI subsystem is enumerated by the firmware,
and if a graphical framebuffer is exposed by a PCI device, its base
address and size are exposed to the OS via the Graphics Output
Protocol (GOP).

On arm64 PCI systems, the entire PCI hierarchy is reconfigured from
scratch at boot. This may result in the GOP framebuffer address to
become stale, if the BAR covering the framebuffer is modified. This
will cause the framebuffer to become unresponsive, and may in some
cases result in unpredictable behavior if the range is reassigned to
another device.

So add a quirk to the EFI fb driver to find the BAR associated with
the GOP base address, and set the IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED attribute so
that the PCI core will leave it alone.

Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: check device is enabled before attempting to claim the resource

  drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
index 8c4dc1e1f94f..88f653864a01 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  #include <linux/efi.h>
  #include <linux/errno.h>
  #include <linux/fb.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
  #include <linux/screen_info.h>
  #include <video/vga.h>
@@ -143,6 +144,9 @@ static struct attribute *efifb_attrs[] = {
  };
  ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(efifb);
+static bool pci_bar_found;	/* did we find a BAR matching the efifb base? */
+static bool pci_dev_disabled;	/* was the device disabled? */
+
  static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
  {
  	struct fb_info *info;
@@ -152,7 +156,7 @@ static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
  	unsigned int size_total;
  	char *option = NULL;
-	if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
+	if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI || pci_dev_disabled)
  		return -ENODEV;
  	if (fb_get_options("efifb", &option))
@@ -360,3 +364,57 @@ static struct platform_driver efifb_driver = {
  };
  builtin_platform_driver(efifb_driver);
+
+static void claim_efifb_bar(struct pci_dev *dev, int idx)
+{
+	u16 word;
+
+	pci_bar_found = true;
+
+	pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &word);
+	if (!(word & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY)) {
+		pci_dev_disabled = true;
+		dev_err(&dev->dev,
+			"BAR %d: assigned to efifb but device is disabled!\n",
+			idx);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (pci_claim_resource(dev, idx)) {
+		pci_dev_disabled = true;
+		dev_err(&dev->dev,
+			"BAR %d: failed to claim resource for efifb!\n", idx);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: assigned to efifb\n", idx);
+}
+
+static void efifb_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	u64 base = screen_info.lfb_base;
+	u64 size = screen_info.lfb_size;
+	int i;
+
+	if (pci_bar_found || screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
+		return;
+
+	if (screen_info.capabilities & VIDEO_CAPABILITY_64BIT_BASE)
+		base |= (u64)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
+
+	if (!base)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++) {
+		struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
+
+		if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM))
+			continue;
+
+		if (res->start <= base && res->end >= base + size - 1) {
Have we considered PCI address translation here? I suppose the
address reported by EFI GOP should be the address of CPU domain, not
address of PCI domain. Address read from PCI BAR is PCI address
which should add translation offset before being compared to CPU
domain address.
Every address in dev->resource[] is a CPU domain address, so address
translation offset should be handled correctly.

This is because __pci_read_base() calls pcibios_bus_to_resource() when
it fills in dev->resource[], and pcibios_bus_to_resource() applies any
host bridge address translation.

Bjorn




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux