Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
From: "Stephen Bates" <sbates@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:43:47 +0000
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAPcyv4gxBgVsbSez7_dZYkZojUWU0X0txs7FxiJ+Z3xsMt6TqQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309

> Yes, this makes sense I think we really just want to distinguish host
> memory or not in terms of the dev_pagemap type.

I would like to see mutually exclusive flags for host memory (or not) and persistence (or not).

Stephen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Dan Williams

References:
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Dan Williams
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Dan Williams
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
  - From: Dan Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci-hyperv: Use only 16 bit integer for PCI domain
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DMA Engine] [Linux Coverity] [Linux USB] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Greybus]