On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > > This allows callers to get back at them instead of having to store
> > > it in another variable.
> >
> > Alternatively you tell the irq code to free it for you. Patch below.
>
> Yes, this should work to. But I think having the same layer free
> something they allocated again is a tad cleaner in terms of layering.
Fair enough. Was just a thought.
Bjorn, please route it through PCI alltogether.
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
tglx
