Hi Dan, On 03/04/17 06:07 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > The completely agnostic part is where I get worried, but I shouldn't > say anymore until I actually read the patch.The worry is cases where > this agnostic enabling allows unsuspecting code paths to do the wrong > thing. Like bypass iomem safety. Yup, you're right the iomem safety issue is a really difficult problem. I think replacing struct page with pfn_t in a bunch of places is probably going to be a requirement for my work. However, this is going to be a very large undertaking. I've done an audit of sg_page users and there will indeed be some difficult cases. However, I'm going to start doing some cleanup and semantic changes to hopefully move in that direction. The first step I've chosen to look at is to create an sg_kmap interface which replaces about 77 (out of ~340) sg_page users. I'm hoping the new interface can have the semantic that sg_kmap can fail (which would happen in the case that no suitable page exists). Eventually, I'd want to get to a place where sg_page either doesn't exists or can fail and is always checked. At that point swapping out pfn_t in the sgl would be manageable. Thoughts? Logan
