On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:54:33PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 12:04 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; > > leann.ogasawara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; marcelo.cerri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stephen > > Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pci-hyperv: Some miscellaneous fixes > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:06:40AM -0700, kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > > From: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Some miscellaneous fixes. > > > > > > K. Y. Srinivasan (2): > > > pci-hyperv: Fix a bug in specifying CPU affinity > > > pci-hyperv: Fix an atomic bug > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > I applied these with Long's reviewed-by to pci/host-hv for v4.12 with the > > following subject lines: > > > > PCI: hv: Specify CPU_AFFINITY_ALL for MSI affinity when >= 32 CPUs > > PCI: hv: Allocate interrupt descriptors with GFP_ATOMIC > > > Thank you. > > > There were two copies of [1/2], which makes this error-prone. I applied > > the second one that defines CPU_AFFINITY_ALL. > > Thanks again; sorry for the confusion. > > > > > They're both marked for stable, but without any clue about when the > > problems were introduced or how serious they are, I did not queue them for > > v4.11. If you want them in v4.11, please supply those additional details. > > I think these issues have been there since the driver got merged upstream. > I would want this to be applied against 4.11 as well. Let me know if I should resend > these patches. No need to resend, but I do need more details about what issues these fix and why they're more urgent than garden-variety bug fixes that are planned for v4.12. In general for-linus is for fixing problems we added during the merge window, or other high-priority, low-risk changes. Bjorn