On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: [...] > > I'm asking why we don't fix the actual problem in PCIe ARM64 adaptation instead > > of working around it by quirks. > > > > I don't see any reason why ACPI ARM64 should carry the burden of legacy systems. > > > > Legacy only applies to DT based systems. > > > > I fully agree with this point: ACPI implies firmware, and so we should > be able to rely on firmware to have initialized the PCIe subsystem by > the time the kernel gets to access it. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/3/458 Lorenzo
