Hello, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:50:03PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > I know this comment was just copied from other devm_ioremap*() > > interfaces, but I think it's slightly misleading to call this the "BUS > > offset". That suggests this is a bus address, but it is not. Maybe > > it should be "resource address" or similar? > > > > I propose a separate patch to update the existing comments, followed > > by this patch to add this new one. > > I agree with you, maybe Tejun has more context on why that parameter > is called BUS offset ? Anyway, I can easily do what you suggest above, > just asking Tejun if there is something I am missing. I'm pretty sure I copied it from somewhere without thinking much about it. Please feel free to change. Thanks. -- tejun
