Re: [PATCH] pci/sriov: Add an option to probe VFs or not before enabling SR-IOV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/20/2017 7:24 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:34:23PM -0500, Bodong Wang wrote:
On 3/20/2017 6:07 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:14:34PM +0200, bodong@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Bodong Wang <bodong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sometimes it is not desirable to probe the virtual functions after
SRIOV is enabled. This can save host side resource usage by VF
instances which would be eventually probed to VMs.

Added a new PCI sysfs interface "sriov_probe_vfs" to control that
>from PF, all current callers still retain the same functionality.
To modify it, echo 0/n/N (disable probe) or 1/y/Y (enable probe) to

/sys/bus/pci/devices/<DOMAIN:BUS:DEVICE.FUNCTION>/sriov_probe_vfs

Note that, the choice must be made before enabling VFs. The change
will not take effect if VFs are already enabled. Simply, one can set
sriov_numvfs to 0, choose whether to probe or not, and then resume
sriov_numvfs.

Bodong, I'm not sure if there is a requirement to load driver for the
specified number of VFs? That indicates no driver will be loaded for
other VFs. If so, this interface might serve the purpose as well.
Gavin, thanks for the review. That is indeed an interesting suggestion.
Theoretically,  we can change that probe_vfs from boolean to integer. And use
it as a counter to probe the first N VFs(if N < total_vfs).  Let's see if
there are any objections.
Ok.

+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
+	if (!pci_dev->is_virtfn ||
+	    (pci_dev->is_virtfn && pci_dev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs)) {
+#endif
+		error = __pci_device_probe(drv, pci_dev);
+		if (error) {
+			pcibios_free_irq(pci_dev);
+			pci_dev_put(pci_dev);
+		}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
	}
+#endif

I think it's reasonable to have a inline function for this check:
It's doable, but what's the benefit?
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
static inline bool pci_device_can_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
	return (!pdev->is_virtfn || pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs);
should be return (!pdev->is_virtfn || (pci_dev->is_virtfn &&
pci_dev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs));

We want to probe that device if 1) it's a PF 2) it'a VF and probe_vfs is set
}
#else
static inline bool pci_device_can_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
	return true;
}
This function will be a waste if CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not defined.
#endif
It makes the code a bit clean. Nope, the proposed conditional
expression is elaborate. Yeah, the purpose is exactly same as
you said: probe driver for non-VF or VFs that were allowed.

      (!pdev->is_virtfn || pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs);

When pdev->is_virtfn is flase, "pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs"
doesn't take effect. Otherwise, it means pdev->is_virtfn is true
indirectly and going to check "pdev->physfn->sriov->probe_vfs".
So it needn't check pdev->is_virtfn explicitly in later case,
but it isn't wrong :)

Thanks,
Gavin

Make sense :) Will apply in V1.

Thanks,

Bodong




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux