Am Dienstag, den 21.02.2017, 10:38 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2017, 11:17 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: > >> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:50:27AM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> > Add various bits of code needed to support i.MX7D variant of the IP. > >> > > >> > Cc: yurovsky@xxxxxxxxx > >> > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt | 13 ++- > >> > drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++----- > >> > include/linux/mfd/syscon/imx7-iomuxc-gpr.h | 4 + > >> > 3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt > >> > index 83aeb1f..11db2ab 100644 > >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt > >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt > >> > @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@ This PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsis Designware PCIe IP > >> > and thus inherits all the common properties defined in designware-pcie.txt. > >> > > >> > Required properties: > >> > -- compatible: "fsl,imx6q-pcie", "fsl,imx6sx-pcie", "fsl,imx6qp-pcie" > >> > +- compatible: > >> > + - "fsl,imx6q-pcie" > >> > + - "fsl,imx6sx-pcie", > >> > + - "fsl,imx6qp-pcie" > >> > + - "fsl,imx7d-pcie" > >> > - reg: base address and length of the PCIe controller > >> > - interrupts: A list of interrupt outputs of the controller. Must contain an > >> > entry for each entry in the interrupt-names property. > >> > @@ -34,6 +38,13 @@ Additional required properties for imx6sx-pcie: > >> > - clock names: Must include the following additional entries: > >> > - "pcie_inbound_axi" > >> > > >> > +Additional required properties for imx7d-pcie: > >> > +- power-domains: Must be set to a phandle pointing to PCIE_PHY power domain > >> > >> This domain is just the PHY? Seems like this needs a separate PHY > >> driver. > >> > > No, it's called the PHY power domain, as that is probably the part that > > draws the most power, but the PCIe core also looses it's state when this > > domain is powered down. So it's probably the complete core that is > > inside this domain. > > A shared domain doesn't mean the phy and core should be 1 node. It is > the separate reset and clock for the PHY that tell me they should be > separate. And I'm pretty sure the DW block and PHY are separate. If > the PHY registers were part of the same register range, then I'd say > they should be one. Then we are on the same page of _not_ splitting out the PHY. :) The DW PCIe PHY has no separate register range on i.MX. In fact the PHY registers are only accessible through a indirection register in the PCIe host controller register range. Regards, Lucas
