On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Frederic Weisbecker
<fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I haven't followed the discussion but this patch has a known issue which is fixed
> with:
> 7bdb59f1ad474bd7161adc8f923cdef10f2638d1
> "tick/nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart"
>
> I hope this fixes your issue.
No, Pavel saw the problem with rc8 too, which already has that fix.
So I think we'll just need to revert that original patch (and that
means that we have to revert the commit you point to as well, since
that ->next_tick field was added by the original commit).
Pavel, can you verify that rc8 with both
24b91e360ef521a2808771633d76ebc68bd5604b
7bdb59f1ad474bd7161adc8f923cdef10f2638d1
reverted works reliably for you?
Linus
