On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:09:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Ashok, Keith] > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:06:48AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:22:56PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > Bjorn Helgaas (1): > > > Revert "PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports" > > > > What's the rationale for reverting this? > > > > You've received patches to fix the issue on both affected machines, > > so a revert seems unnecessary: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9557113/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9562007/ > > I don't think we've gotten to the root cause of the problem yet, > and I don't want to throw in fixes at the last minute without a better > understanding of it. > > PCIe hotplug hardware is not very complicated, it hasn't changed in > many years, and at least for the Intel hardware in question, is > generally pretty well-tested with Windows. So I want to be careful > about asserting that this new piece of hardware is broken. I apologize: I had quirks on the brain, but neither of the patches above is device-specific. So neither is claiming broken hardware. However, 9557113 claims we get unwanted PME interrupts if the slot is occupied when we suspend to D3hot. This is what I want to explore further, because that hardware behavior doesn't really make sense to me. 9562007 apparently fixes something, but at this point it's a debugging patch (no changelog or signed-off-by) so not a candidate for tossing into v4.10 at this late date. Bjorn