> On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Legacy interrupts are level sensitive, so using handle_level_irq is
> > more approprate as it is masks interrupts until End point handles
> > interrupts and unmasks interrutps after End point handler is executed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> > index e1809f9..50f9c0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data
> > *data) static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> > irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
>
> Please merge this patch and the following one in patch #2. There is no need for
> going through equally broken intermediate steps.
>
Agreed, will merge it with second patch.
Thanks & Regards,
Bharat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
