Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 05/12/16 12:14 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
But CMB sounds much more like the GPU case where there is a
specialized allocator handing out the BAR to consumers, so I'm not
sure a general purpose chardev makes a lot of sense?

I don't think it will ever need to be as complicated as the GPU case. There will probably only ever be a relatively small amount of memory behind the CMB and really the only users are those doing P2P work. Thus the specialized allocator could be pretty simple and I expect it would be fine to just return -ENOMEM if there is not enough memory.

Also, if it was implemented this way, if there was a need to make the allocator more complicated it could easily be added later as the userspace interface is just mmap to obtain a buffer.

Logan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux