On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:56:15AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > I can easily make the changes Robin suggests above, I need to know > what to do with this patch it is the last blocking point for this > series and time is running out I can revert to using dev->bus to > retrieve iommu_ops (even though I do not think it makes sense given > what Robin outlines below) but I need to know please, we can't gate > an entire series for this patch that is just syntactic sugar. Well, I didn't really object to the approach per-se, I just wanted to know the rationale behind the need for the iommu-ops pointer. So through which tree should this series be merged? I think I can live with the pointer for now, we can later convert it to an iommu-instance pointer. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
