Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:15:15PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:52:06AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Respin of this series to polish the runtime PM support for PCIe ports
> > > that was added with v4.8, and extend it to native hotplug ports:
> [snip]
> > I applied these to pci/pm for v4.10, thanks!
> > 
> > I did make two changes to the changelog of the last patch: you
> > mentioned the "subordinate" bus, and I changed it to "secondary".  We
> > have often used "subordinate" to refer to the immediately-downstream
> > bus, but that's slightly confusing because in the bridge spec,
> > "subordinate" means the highest bus number downstream from the bridge,
> > while "secondary" refers to the immediately-downstream bridge.  Am I
> > making sense or confusing things more?
> 
> Indeed the secondary bus was meant here and I used "subordinate" only
> because the attribute in struct pci_dev is named like this. :-)

Yeah, I wish it weren't named that way, but I guess we're stuck with
that one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux