[+cc Shawn, Heiko, Michal, Soren, Bharat, Rob H, Frank, devicetree@vger]
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:39:01PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 12 November 2016 03:08 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:54:37PM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> >> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> This node pointer is returned by of_get_next_child() with refcount
> >> incremented in this function. of_node_put() on it before exitting
> >> this function on error.
> >>
> >> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Kishon, this looks correct to me, so I applied it to pci/host-dra7xx for
> > v4.10. Let me know if you have any issue with it.
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
> >> index 9595fad..79297e9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
> >> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> &intx_domain_ops, pp);
> >> if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> >> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get a INTx IRQ domain\n");
> >> + of_node_put(pcie_intc_node);
>
> I think of_node_put should be used for both the error case and non-error case.
Hmm, OK. I don't know what the rules are. Certainly if we made these
drivers modular, I don't think we'd want to leak these references
every time we unload/reload the module. Should we do the put
immediately here, or in the module remove path, or ...?
Adding other driver and DT folks for comment.
I dropped these patches for now (dra7xx, rockchip, xilinx-nwl,
xilinx).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
