On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:55:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:42:28AM +0000, Rick Kerkhof wrote:
> > > > No, there are not. Here is the recursive directory listing:
> > >
> > > Are you able to try the following patch and send me dmesg (or attach it
> > > to that bug)? It should show if the ACPI core even tries to add those
> > > power resources.
> >
> > So Rick has tested this patch now on top of 4.8.4 (mainline fails to
> > boot due to a kbuild issue which I reported elsewhere), but the output
> > is empty. That seems to indicate that flags.power_resources is unset.
>
> Is it completely empty or is it empty just for RP05? It should print out
> all devices with power resources.
\NVP2 and \NVP3 are the only power resources under RP05 and defined in
SSDT1, there are no others.
Kind regards,
Peter
> > Given that _PS3 exists and is indeed a package with some elements, it
> > seems that acpi_extract_power_resources is failing. Note that in the
> > SSDT, the power resource NVP3 was referenced before it was defined,
> > could that result in this enumeration failure? Relevant SSDT excerpt:
> >
> > Scope (\_SB.PCI0.RP05)
> > {
> > Name (_PR3, Package (0x01) // _PR3: Power Resources for D3hot
> > {
> > NVP3
> > })
> > // ...
> > }
> >
> > PowerResource (NVP3, 0x00, 0x0000)
>
> That and the fact that they come from an SSDT instead of DSDT may cause
> this. However, I'm not expert in ACPICA so adding Bob and Lv if they
> have ideas.
>
> Bob, Lv, the bug in question is: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98398
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
