> On 30/08/16 15:13, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > >> Hi Bharat, > >>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > >>> nwl_pcie > >> *pcie) > >>> } > >>> > >>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > >>> - INTX_NUM, > >>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > >>> &legacy_domain_ops, > >>> pcie); > >> > >> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so the > >> domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the way the > >> driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to > the HW interrupt). > >> > > Hi Marc, > > > > Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > > > [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > > [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > > > [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > > > [ 2.441706] > > > > [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > > > [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > > > [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > ffffffc071888000 > > > > [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > > [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > > In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > > > if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain->name)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above condition > (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > > Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have interrupt > sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n-1). Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash occurs. > > > And I'm consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt as in > > nwl_pcie_leg_handler I get 0th bit set from MSGF_LEG_STATUS if INTA > > interrupt is raised but my hwirq number being mapped for INTA is 0x1 > > so that's I'm adding 1 to obtain correct virtual irq. Same case in > > nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain since hwirq starts from one I'm adding 1 to > > obtain virtual irq and free it. > > I can see that. Nonetheless, this is wrong. Can you please test the patch I > provided in my reply and report what happens? Can you be more specific on what is the wrong, I'm adding one since the hwirq starts from 0x1 as mentioned above. I did try your suggestion with Ethernet card, but kernel hangs (it does not show any crash also, just hangs) when I do interface up (without bit + 1, using only bit position in handler). This is not working because in the legacy domain virq mapping starts with hwirq 0x1, there is no mapping for 0x0 in the domain, so EP interrupt is not serviced since virq being returned is zero. Thanks & Regards, Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
