On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 6:13:00 PM CEST Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Tegra is one of the remaining platforms that still use the traditional
> > > pci_common_init_dev() interface for probing PCI host bridges.
> > >
> > > This demonstrates how to convert it to the pci_register_host interface
> > > I just added in a previous patch. This leads to a more linear probe
> > > sequence that can handle errors better because we avoid callbacks into
> > > the driver, and it makes the driver architecture independent.
> > >
> > > As a side note, I should mention that I noticed this driver does not
> > > register any IORESOURCE_IO resource with the bus, but instead registers
> > > the I/O port window as a memory resource, which is surely a bug.
> >
> > I do not think that's true (and these comments do not belong in
> > a commit log anyway). It registers both; granted the way
> > the resources are named is a bit misleading, but by looking
> > at the code it seems correct to me (struct tegra_pcie.{io/pio}).
>
> Hmm, I don't remember when or why I wrote this comment, but it seems
> you are right. This was apparently fixed by 5106787a9e08 ("PCI: tegra:
> Use physical range for I/O mapping"), which I reviewed and which
> has been applied a long time ago, surely before I sent the first
> version of this patch.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > > index 2d520755b1d7..6737d1be9798 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > > @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static inline struct tegra_msi *to_tegra_msi(struct msi_controller *chip)
> > > }
> > >
> > > struct tegra_pcie {
> > > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> >
> > If we go for the zero length array approach we would remove this
> > pointer too, since it would be superfluos, a container_of would
> > just do, right ?
>
> Regardless of whether we have a zero-length array or the current
> code, we can provide a helper function that computes the pointer
> to the pci_host_bridge from the tegra_pcie pointer.
Yes, that's true as I said it is just a matter of choosing the
best way to implement it but the mechanism is pretty much identical.
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
