On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:11:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ahci currently insists on an explicit call to pci_intx before falling back
> from MSI or MSI-X to legacy irqs. As pci_intx is a no-op if the command
> register already contains the right value is seems safe and useful to add
> this call to pci_alloc_irq_vectors so that ahci can just use
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors.
Looking at ahci_init_interrupts() (and probably at commit d684a90d
("ahci: per-port msix support")) it looks like pci_alloc_irq_vectors()
is able to preserve the current AHCI logic?
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 9233e7f..593698e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -1200,8 +1200,11 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> }
>
> /* use legacy irq if allowed */
> - if ((flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) && min_vecs == 1)
> + if ((flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) && min_vecs == 1) {
> + pci_intx(dev, 1);
It would rather called pci_intx_for_msi() here. But because it is
a generic code I am not sure what implications it has for all
drivers out there.
> return 1;
> + }
> +
> return vecs;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_irq_vectors);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
