I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index c8b4dbd..3f583ad 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -4897,7 +4897,7 @@ static ssize_t pci_resource_alignment_store(struct bus_type *bus, return pci_set_resource_alignment_param(buf, count); } -BUS_ATTR(resource_alignment, 0644, pci_resource_alignment_show, +BUS_ATTR(resource_alignment, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, pci_resource_alignment_show, pci_resource_alignment_store); static int __init pci_resource_alignment_sysfs_init(void) -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
