Hi again,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:12:55PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:16:38PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> > +static void rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > + struct rockchip_pcie_port *port;
> > + u32 reg;
> > + u32 hwirq;
> > + u32 virq;
> > +
> > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > + port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > +
> > + reg = pcie_read(port, PCIE_CLIENT_INT_STATUS);
> > + reg = (reg & ROCKCHIP_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK) >>
> > + ROCKCHIP_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + while (reg) {
> > + hwirq = ffs(reg);
As I noted on the DT binding patch, the use of 'ffs' here is causing you
to make the interrupt controller binding implicitly 1-based, where it
would seemingly make more sense to be 0-based I think.
> > + reg &= ~BIT(hwirq);
>
> Per Marc's suggestion, you have created an infinite loop :)
>
> This should be:
>
> hwirq = ffs(reg);
> reg &= ~BIT(hwirq - 1);
So, this should actually be:
hwirq = ffs(reg) - 1;
reg &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> ...which brings me to this question: are you ever testing non-MSI (i.e.,
> "legacy") interrupts on this driver? There seems to be quite a bit of
> discussion about the structuring of the interrupt-map and
> interrupt-controller handling, but it appears this mostly/only gets
> actually *used* for the legacy interrupt case, and on my tests, legacy
> interrupts aren't really working, at least not with the new binding
> examples that you proposed. But then, you didn't send a rk3399.dtsi
> update, so perhaps I constructed my DTS wrong...
>
> If you haven't been testing legacy interrupts, I'd recommend booting
> with "pci=nomsi" and see what happens.
>
> > +
> > + virq = irq_find_mapping(port->irq_domain, hwirq);
> > + if (virq)
> > + generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > + else
> > + dev_err(port->dev, "unexpected IRQ, INT%d\n", hwirq);
> > + }
> > +
> > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
