On Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:45:42 PM CEST Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:34:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I think some other PCI hosts just move the interrupt-controller > > and #interrupt-cells properties into the PCI host node itself, > > which avoids the ambiguity here. > > Do you have an example of this? I have modeled my DT binding after the > one used by the pci-dra7xx driver, which is in the same situation as I > am in terms of interrupt handling. > > But I can indeed try to make the top-level PCIe controller node the > interrupt controller. Let me try that quickly. > Looking at the binding files, I see only this one: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/altera-pcie.txt and a couple of others using a child node. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
