[+cc Geert] On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:09:53AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 05/09/2016 09:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Hi Hannes, > > > > Geert's list of build regressions and improvements > > (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462782250-6231-1-git-send-email-geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > > shows these new warnings: > > > > drivers/pci/access.c: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 4 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat=]: => 318:8 > > drivers/pci/access.c: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 5 has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat=]: => 340:6 > > > > which I think are due to 104daa71b396 ("PCI: Determine actual VPD size on > > first access"). > > > > Would you mind fixing those up and sending me a patch? These were in > > the v4.6-rc1 regressions email, and I should have noticed then, but I > > didn't. > > > This is curious. > The code has this: > > size_t off = 0; > > ... > > dev_warn(&dev->dev, > "invalid large VPD tag %02x size at offset %zu", > tag, off + 1); > > Which, as per my reading, suggests that the last argument to > dev_warn() is of type size_t. > > Which tree has generated the above warning? Yeah, it wasn't obvious to me how this would happen either. From Geert's original email, I think the tree is v4.6-rc7, i.e., 44549e8f5eea4e0a41b487b63e616cb089922b99. Geert, can you tell which config generated this warning? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
