On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 04:12:24 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:23:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> > Breaking any systems that work today is not an option. if that >>> > happens, the commit that has done that is a clear candidate for >>> > reverting. >>> >>> Understood, thanks. >>> >>> BTW, do you have any preference regarding the cut-off date? >> >> Some time around when machines with Windows 10 started to ship should be >> relatively safe. >> >> I guess we can just pick a reasonable date in the initial patch and then >> try to move it back to the past subsequently and see if that breaks things >> for anyone. > > Maybe add a boot option to overwrite the heuristic (in both > directions) to allow people to test this on older machines and > pinpoint breakage on newer machines? Yes, a kernel command line override would be fine by me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
