Re: PCI IO resource question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/18/2016 11:09 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 07:28 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> The only ways I see that PCI_PROBE_ONLY can be set on ARM are if you have
>>>> "linux,pci-probe-only" in your DT or you boot with "pci=firmware".
>>>>
>>>> I expect you're in this path:
>>>>
>>>>   ahci_init_one
>>>>     pcim_enable_device
>>>>       pci_enable_device
>>>>         pci_enable_device_flags(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_IO)
>>>>           # build "bars" mask
>>>>           do_pci_enable_device(dev, bars)
>>>>             pcibios_enable_device
>>>>               if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
>>>>                 return 0;
>>>>               pci_enable_resources
>>>>
>>>> Can you add a little debug code like this to verify that we're in this
>>>> path?
>>>
>>> Yes we are in the path.
>>>
>>>
>>> [    1.557561] ahci_init_one
>>> [    1.560214] ahci 0000:01:00.0: version 3.0
>>> [    1.564302] pcim_enable_device
>>> [    1.567349] pci_enable_device
>>> [    1.570340] pci_enable_device_flags
>>> [    1.573824] do_pci_enable_device
>>> [    1.577042] pcibios_enable_device
>>> [    1.580380] pci_enable_resources
>>
>> So resources are actually enabled (ie PCI_PROBE_ONLY is not set)
>> and that makes sense otherwise you would not be able to use the
>> MEM resources anyway (ie they would not be enabled).
>>
>> I suspect the PCI dev IO resources were reset in reset_resource() in
>> assign_requested_resource_sorted(), hence the bar mask that is built
>> in pci_enable_device_flags() does not contain the IO resources,
>> it would be helpful if you can print the bar mask passed to
>> pcibios_enable_device() (ie the mask parameter).
> 
> Here it is
> 
> [    1.556507] ahci_init_one
> [    1.559124] ahci 0000:01:00.0: version 3.0
> [    1.563246] pcim_enable_device
> [    1.566294] pci_enable_device
> [    1.569252] pci_enable_device_flags
> [    1.572766] do_pci_enable_device
> [    1.575985] pcibios_enable_device 60
> [    1.579551] pci_enable_resources
> 

I see only see memory resources passed in 

[    1.592835] pci_enable_resources, mask 60
[    1.596843] ahci 0000:01:00.0: res 5: [mem 0x60000000-0x600001ff]
[    1.602962] ahci 0000:01:00.0: res 6: [mem 0x60100000-0x6010ffff pref]

> I know that some of our customers use PCIe SATA from u-boot and would
> like to honor the assignment in Linux space.. I believe they use PCI_PROBE_ONLY
> by setting the bootarg. So Keystone PCI should work in both cases.
> 
> Murali
>>
>> Not saying that's what should happen, I think that's what's happening,
>> that's the only reason I see why you do not have pci_enable_resources()
>> failures when you remove the IO range from the host bridge.
>>
>> Lorenzo
>>
>>> [    1.583608] ahci 0000:01:00.0: limiting MRRS to 256
>>> [    1.588595] ahci 0000:01:00.0: AHCI 0001.0000 32 slots 2 ports 6 Gbps 0x3 impl SATA mode
>>> [    1.596716] ahci 0000:01:00.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf led only pmp fbs pio slum part sxs 
>>> [    1.606183] scsi host0: ahci
>>> [    1.609448] scsi host1: ahci
>>> [    1.612636] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m512@0x60000000 port 0x60000100 irq 82
>>> [    1.619974] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m512@0x60000000 port 0x60000180 irq 82
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I looked at pci_enable_resources()
>>>>>
>>>>> 	for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
>>>>> 		if (!(mask & (1 << i)))
>>>>> 			continue;
>>>>>
>>>>> 		r = &dev->resource[i];
>>>>
>>>>                 dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d %pR mask %#04x parent %p\n", i, r, mask, r->parent);
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 		if (!(r->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM)))
>>>>> 			continue;
>>>>> 		if ((i == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) &&
>>>>> 				(!(r->flags & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE)))
>>>>> 			continue;
>>>>>
>>>>> 		if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) {
>>>>> 			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't enable device: BAR %d %pR not assigned\n",
>>>>> 				i, r);
>>>>> 			return -EINVAL;
>>>>> 		}
>>>>>
>>>>> 		if (!r->parent) {
>>>>> 			dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't enable device: BAR %d %pR not claimed\n",
>>>>> 				i, r);
>>>>> 			return -EINVAL;
>>>>> 		}
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see the error "can't enable device: BAR %d %pR not assigned" , so it doesn't
>>>>> depend on IO bar as you mention below or is it in a different function?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Murali Karicheri
>>> Linux Kernel, Keystone
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
> 
> 


-- 
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux