On 03/08/2016 03:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2016, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Roberto Fichera: >> On 03/03/2016 07:34 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>> On 03/03/2016 03:34 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: >>> >>> I've also checked clock, pll, PMU_MISC1 and CCGR[45] registers, all looks fine >>> and exactly equal to uboot settings. >>> >>> However I'm investigating a possible HW issue in the LDVS pad wiring against >>> the bridge XIO2001. Let's see once this is also clarified. >> Our HW engineer has applied a fix to LVDS vs XIO2001 clock wiring. However I'm still getting the same problem. >> >> I've tried to boot a kernel with uboot not setting up the PCIe subsys and below there is the resulting kernel log. >> Note that the CCGR5 doesn't set the CG2 field associated to sata_clk_enable. I think this field should be set all 1 to >> enable the SATA ref at 100MHz, right? >> > No, the reference manual is a bit confusing about this, but the LVDS1 > clock output is driven by sata_ref_100mhz, not the sata_clk gate. > > So the only thing that needs to be enabled for LVDS clock output is the > 100MHz clock output from PLL ENET. (Register CCM_ANALOG_PLL_ENETn bit > 20). > > Can you please try to revert the commit I pointed out in my last mail > and see if it helps? We might be holding the PCI device reset gpio at > the wrong level with this commit. Ok! Will do! > > Regards, > Lucas > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
