Taking another stab at it.
On 3/2/2016 10:14 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Taking a step back here and also some inspiration from your code, why don't we
> fix the actual problem instead of redesigning the whole thing?
I read your email multiple times. I think you want to move the x86 specific pieces
(ISA interrupts and its command line arguments) out of the drivers\acpi\pci_link.c.
Is this right?
- the legacy ISA IRQs, i.e., the contents of acpi_irq_isa_penalty[]
- acpi_irq_isa= from command line
int pcibios_irq_penalty(int irq)
{
if (irq >= ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
return 0;
return acpi_irq_isa_penalty[irq] + acpi_irq_cmd_line_penalty[irq];
}
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
