> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:46 AM > To: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; > apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang > Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx; Hadden > Hoppert <haddenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end > for Hyper-V VMs > > Hi Jake, > > Looks good to me overall; I marked a few nits below. > > The only real question I have is about domain number allocation. See > the note below. > [snip] > > + > > + /* > > + * The PCI bus "domain" is what is called "segment" in > > + * ACPI and other specs. Pull it from the instance ID, > > + * to get something unique. Bytes 8 and 9 are what is used > > + * in Windows guests, so do the same thing for consistency. > > + */ > > + > > + hbus->sysdata.domain = hdev->dev_instance.b[9] | > > + hdev->dev_instance.b[8] << 8; > > How do we know this is unique? We don't have any idea what the > platform will put in _SEG, so I think there's a potential conflict > here. The Intel VMD driver (arch/x86/pci/vmd.c) has a similar > problem, and it looks for unused domain numbers starting at 0x10000 > (see vmd_find_free_domain()). > Bjorn, thank you for your very thorough reviews. I deeply appreciate it. I checked the Hyper-V code and it currently does guarantee that these values are unique. When I resend the series, I'll add a comment to that effect. I'll also add a comment to Hyper-V that says that it has to stay that way. I'll resend shortly. Thanks again, Jake -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
