> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] Microblaze: Modifying microblaze PCI subsytem
> to support generic Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge IP driver
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:49:20AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] Microblaze: Modifying microblaze PCI
> > > subsytem to support generic Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge IP driver
> > >
> > > [+cc Ben for real this time]
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > [+cc Ben, pcibios_get_phb_of_node() question]
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > > > This patch does required modifications to microblaze PCI
> > > > > subsystem, to work with generic driver
> > > > > (drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c) on Microblaze and Zynq.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx> ...
> > > >
> > > > > resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct
> > > > > resource
> > > *res,
> > > > > resource_size_t size, resource_size_t
> align) {
> > > > > - struct pci_dev *dev = data;
> > > > > resource_size_t start = res->start;
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> > > > > - if (skip_isa_ioresource_align(dev))
> > > > > - return start;
> > > > > - if (start & 0x300)
> > > > > - start = (start + 0x3ff) & ~0x3ff;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > -
> > > > > return start;
> > > >
> > > > "return res->start;" is sufficient; no need for a temporary variable.
> > > >
> > Agreed will address in next patch.
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> > > > >
> > > > > +int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) {
> > > > > + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> > > > > +
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > > > > * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > > > > @@ -1335,9 +1308,21 @@ static void
> > > > > pcibios_setup_phb_resources(struct pci_controller *hose,
> > > > >
> > > > > struct device_node *pcibios_get_phb_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> > > > > - struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata;
> > > > > + struct device_node *np;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + for_each_node_by_type(np, "pci") {
> > > > > + const void *prop;
> > > > > + unsigned int bus_min;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + prop = of_get_property(np, "bus-range", NULL);
> > > > > + if (!prop)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > + bus_min = be32_to_cpup(prop);
> > > > > + if (bus->number == bus_min)
> > > > > + return np;
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > - return of_node_get(hose->dn);
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm. The old microblaze code ("return of_node_get(hose->dn);")
> > > > is basically the same as the mips and powerpc versions. The new
> > > > code is basically the same as the x86 version.
> > > >
> > > > I like the generic weak version in drivers/pci/of.c because it
> > > > doesn't use any arch-specific data, and it looks like if we just
> > > > set the struct device.of_node members correctly, everything should
> Just Work.
> > > >
> > > > But Ben added both the generic and the x86 versions the same day,
> > > > so there must be some complication:
> > > >
> > > > 98d9f30c820d ("pci/of: Match PCI devices to OF nodes dynamically")
> > > > 3d5fe5a65af9 ("x86/devicetree: Use generic PCI <-> OF matching")
> > > >
> > > > So I guess my question is, why do we need a microblaze-specific
> > > > version at all?
> > > >
> > I did not notice the weak version in /pci/of.c, I have tested with
> > weak version also and it is working. We might not need this
> > microblaze specific version, but will wait for ben's reply.
>
> If the generic version works, and you don't need the microblaze- specific
> version, just remove it and we'll get this wrapped up. No need to wait for
> Ben.
>
Ok Bjorn, I will remove it and send next series of patches.
Bharat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
