Re: [PATCH v7 08/50] powerpc/powernv: Rename PE# fields in struct pnv_phb

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> This renames the fields related to PE number in "struct pnv_phb"
> for better reflecting of their usages as Alexey suggested. No
> logical changes introduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c |  2 +-
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c    | 56 ++++++++++++++--------------
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c         |  2 +-
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h         |  4 +-
>   4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> index e1c9072..861a7d2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int pnv_eeh_init(void)
>   		 * and P7IOC separately. So we should regard
>   		 * PE#0 as valid for PHB3 and P7IOC.
>   		 */
> -		if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe != 0)
> +		if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx != 0)
>   			eeh_add_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO);
>
>   		break;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> index 968da91..b4932c3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(unsigned long flags)
>
>   static void pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no)
>   {
> -	if (!(pe_no >= 0 && pe_no < phb->ioda.total_pe)) {
> +	if (!(pe_no >= 0 && pe_no < phb->ioda.total_pe_num)) {
>   		pr_warn("%s: Invalid PE %d on PHB#%x\n",
>   			__func__, pe_no, phb->hose->global_number);
>   		return;
> @@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ static int pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>
>   	do {
>   		pe = find_next_zero_bit(phb->ioda.pe_alloc,
> -					phb->ioda.total_pe, 0);
> -		if (pe >= phb->ioda.total_pe)
> +					phb->ioda.total_pe_num, 0);
> +		if (pe >= phb->ioda.total_pe_num)
>   			return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>   	} while(test_and_set_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc));
>
> @@ -209,13 +209,13 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_init_m64(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>   	 * expected to be 0 or last one of PE capabicity.
>   	 */
>   	r = &phb->hose->mem_resources[1];
> -	if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe == 0)
> +	if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == 0)
>   		r->start += phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
> -	else if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe == (phb->ioda.total_pe - 1))
> +	else if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == (phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1))
>   		r->end -= phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>   	else
>   		pr_warn("  Cannot strip M64 segment for reserved PE#%d\n",
> -			phb->ioda.reserved_pe);
> +			phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx);
>
>   	return 0;
>
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>   		return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>
>   	/* Allocate bitmap */
> -	size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
> +	size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe_num / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
>   	pe_alloc = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!pe_alloc) {
>   		pr_warn("%s: Out of memory !\n",
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>   	 * contributed by its child buses. For the case, we needn't
>   	 * pick M64 dependent PE#.
>   	 */
> -	if (bitmap_empty(pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe)) {
> +	if (bitmap_empty(pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe_num)) {
>   		kfree(pe_alloc);
>   		return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>   	}
> @@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>   	 */
>   	master_pe = NULL;
>   	i = -1;
> -	while ((i = find_next_bit(pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe, i + 1)) <
> -		phb->ioda.total_pe) {
> +	while ((i = find_next_bit(pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe_num, i + 1)) <
> +		phb->ioda.total_pe_num) {
>   		pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[i];
>
>   		if (!master_pe) {
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void __init pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>   	hose->mem_offset[1] = res->start - pci_addr;
>
>   	phb->ioda.m64_size = resource_size(res);
> -	phb->ioda.m64_segsize = phb->ioda.m64_size / phb->ioda.total_pe;
> +	phb->ioda.m64_segsize = phb->ioda.m64_size / phb->ioda.total_pe_num;
>   	phb->ioda.m64_base = pci_addr;
>
>   	pr_info(" MEM64 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx\n",
> @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_get_pe_state(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no)
>   	s64 rc;
>
>   	/* Sanity check on PE number */
> -	if (pe_no < 0 || pe_no >= phb->ioda.total_pe)
> +	if (pe_no < 0 || pe_no >= phb->ioda.total_pe_num)
>   		return OPAL_EEH_STOPPED_PERM_UNAVAIL;
>
>   	/*
> @@ -1394,9 +1394,9 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>   		} else {
>   			mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
>   			*pdn->pe_num_map = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
> -				phb->ioda.pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe,
> +				phb->ioda.pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe_num,
>   				0, num_vfs, 0);
> -			if (*pdn->pe_num_map >= phb->ioda.total_pe) {
> +			if (*pdn->pe_num_map >= phb->ioda.total_pe_num) {
>   				mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
>   				dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable VF%d\n", num_vfs);
>   				kfree(pdn->pe_num_map);
> @@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   	pdn->m64_single_mode = false;
>
>   	total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
> -	mul = phb->ioda.total_pe;
> +	mul = phb->ioda.total_pe_num;
>   	total_vf_bar_sz = 0;
>
>   	for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> @@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg(struct pci_controller *hose,
>   			region.end   = res->end - phb->ioda.io_pci_base;
>   			index = region.start / phb->ioda.io_segsize;
>
> -			while (index < phb->ioda.total_pe &&
> +			while (index < phb->ioda.total_pe_num &&
>   			       region.start <= region.end) {
>   				phb->ioda.io_segmap[index] = pe->pe_number;
>   				rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
> @@ -2797,7 +2797,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg(struct pci_controller *hose,
>   				       phb->ioda.m32_pci_base;
>   			index = region.start / phb->ioda.m32_segsize;
>
> -			while (index < phb->ioda.total_pe &&
> +			while (index < phb->ioda.total_pe_num &&
>   			       region.start <= region.end) {
>   				phb->ioda.m32_segmap[index] = pe->pe_number;
>   				rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
> @@ -3067,13 +3067,13 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct device_node *np,
>   		pr_err("  Failed to map registers !\n");
>
>   	/* Initialize more IODA stuff */
> -	phb->ioda.total_pe = 1;
> +	phb->ioda.total_pe_num = 1;
>   	prop32 = of_get_property(np, "ibm,opal-num-pes", NULL);
>   	if (prop32)
> -		phb->ioda.total_pe = be32_to_cpup(prop32);
> +		phb->ioda.total_pe_num = be32_to_cpup(prop32);
>   	prop32 = of_get_property(np, "ibm,opal-reserved-pe", NULL);
>   	if (prop32)
> -		phb->ioda.reserved_pe = be32_to_cpup(prop32);
> +		phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx = be32_to_cpup(prop32);


It is not related to the patch but you initialize total_pe to 1 before 
checking the device tree (which is ok) but you do not initialize 
reserved_pe and I cannot find where @phb would be zeroed - it is allocated 
by memblock_virt_alloc() which does not do that.



--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html