On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:27:42AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>
>> +void pcibios_setup_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long type)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>Very much a nit-pick, but I thought we were trying to move towards using
>phb instead of hose in new code?
>
Take PowerNV platform as an example, "hose" means "struct pci_controller",
but "phb" means "struct pnv_phb". We don't have the movement to use "phb"
to represent "struct pci_controller".
>Apart from that this looks good. I would probably have merged it with
>the previous patch, but I know Alexey has been suggesting a lot of
>splitting and merging previously, so whatever he prefers here is OK.
>
I'd like to keep them separate as they're for different subsystem:
PCI generic subsystem and PowerPC subsystem. Separate maintainers
for them can pick them as they will.
>> +
>> + if (hose->controller_ops.setup_bridge)
>> + hose->controller_ops.setup_bridge(bus, type);
>> +}
>> +
>> void pcibios_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct pci_controller *phb = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
