On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Lots of other architectures have both mem32 and mem64 apertures. You >>>> haven't explained what's unique about sparc yet. Does >>>> pci_find_parent_resource() not work on sparc? If not, is that because the >>>> resource tree looks different on sparc than on other architectures? If so, >>>> is that difference something intentional that we want to keep, or should we >>>> converge on a single resource tree format across all architectures? >>> >>> In the new pci_register_legacy_regions(), we only have root bus. >>> but current pci_find_parent_resource is taking pci dev. >>> >>> So will need to change it to take bus instead, please check if you are ok >>> with following, then I would update other two. >> >> Never mind, I could just one dummy pci device to work around it. >> so don't need to change that. > > Khalid, > > Please use attached two to replace patch2, patch3 and patch4. > looks like i mix the use root bus resource with parent bus resource ... so that still have problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
