Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: IOV: read SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/15/2015 02:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 10/15/2015 10:58 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi Ben,

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:20:17AM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
For some SR-IOV devices, the number of available virtual functions increases
after enabling ARI.  Currently, SRIOV_NUM_VF is read and saved off before the
ARI control bit is enabled in SRIOV_CTRL.  This causes an issue when VFs are
enabled.

At device init, SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF are specified to contain the
number of available VFs for the device.  sriov_enable() does a sanity check
that SRIOV_INITIAL_VF is not greater than iov->total_VFs, the saved-off value
of SRIOV_NUM_VF.  Since the value of both SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF has
increased after enabling the ARI bit, the check fails, and the VFs cannot be
enabled.

To fix the issue, write SRIOV_CTRL first, and then read SRIOV_NUM_VF.
I think you mean PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VR (not NUM_VF), right?

This is interesting because the spec says TotalVFs is HwInit, which
means it's read-only, and it doesn't mention anything about it
changing when ARIis enabled.  I can see why it would change in that
case, so maybe this is just a goof in the spec.
I think it is supposed to be HwInit because changing the value can
cause issues with resource allocation for the VFs.  Specifically if
the number of VFs increases after the BIOS has come through and
assigned MMIO resources it is possible that there may not be
resources available.
Maybe, although sufficiently smart software could deal with that by
reassigning resources.  Theoretically, anyway.

I suspect we are going to end up having to quirk a number of devices
in the future because of this as I can see this easily causing
issues.
I guess the issue if we made this change would be:

   - BIOS sees "ARI Capable Hierarchy" is zero
   - BIOS sees TotalVFs = X
   - BIOS allocates space for X VFs (size = "S * X")
   - Linux sets ARI Capable Hierarchy
   - Linux sees TotalVFs = X + Y
   - Linux reads SR-IOV BAR, computes size as "S * (X + Y)"
   - Linux tries to claim SR-IOV BAR, but fails because size is now too
     large to fit where BIOS put it

Right?  What sort of quirk would you envision?  Something to keep us
from increasing "total" beyond what it was before we turned on ARI
Capable?

The thing we would have to do in such a situation is force a reallocation of the BARs in the SR-IOV area. Maybe instead of adding a quirk we could just add code here so that if totalVFs increases after we set ARI we clear the BAR registers and force reallocation. If I am not mistaken the reallocation for unassigned bars would take place after this code is run so it is probably the right place to do it.

What problem does this patch solve, Ben?  I assume you have devices
that do change TotalVFs when ARI is enabled, and you do want the new
value?

Or is the problem something like the following:

   - ...
   - Linux PCI core sees TotalVFs = X (saved as iov->total_VFs)
   - Linux sets ARI Capable Hierarchy
   - Device changes TotalVFs to X + Y (but PCI core doesn't notice)
   - Driver reads TotalVFs and sees X + Y
   - Driver attempts pci_enable_sriov(dev, X + Y), which fails because
     sriov_enable() sees "X + Y > iov->total_VFs"

I'm a little dubious about drivers reading the SRIOV capability
directly, so maybe this is a symptom of deeper problems.

I don't think the issue is the drivers reading the SR-IOV config, it is likely the end users. They will want to get full use of the device and they would see the config lists something like 64 VFs being available via lspci, but the kernel would have them capped at 7.

I think instead of just moving the read we should read it before and after. If the value increases we should just drop the contents of the base address registers so that they can be reallocated now that the memory footprint has changed.

- Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux