On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:52:40PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Russell,
>
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:13:02 +0100, Russell King wrote:
>
> > + ret = devm_add_action(dev, mvebu_pcie_port_clk_put, port);
>
> I didn't know about devm_add_action(). Definitely very useful for such
> situations.
I was also surprised by this. Nice.
> > @@ -1052,10 +1086,12 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> >
> > ret = mvebu_pcie_parse_port(pcie, port, child);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + of_node_put(child);
> > return ret;
> > - else if (ret == 0)
> > + } else if (ret == 0) {
> > continue;
> > + }
>
> This is not trivial. If I understand correctly,
> for_each_available_child_of_node() will automatically release the
> reference on the previous node and take the reference on the new one
> before entering the loop code. So in the skipping case, we don't need
> to release the reference as it will be done by the next iteration of
> the loop, but in the error case, since we are unexpectedly breaking the
> loop, we need to do it manually.
>
> The sort of tricky thing that should be documented near
> for_each_child_of_node(), since I believe a lot of code gets this
> wrong.
Sounds like a good candidate for a coccinelle script. Maybe you could
ask Julia Lawall?
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
