> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed that a PCIe device is at slot address 0, but for the
> general case, including conventional PCI, it's incorrect. We need
> to get the slot and then convert it back into a devfn.
>
> Fixes: 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0")
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>
> Since the original patch and quirk was marked for stable and applies
> to all Intel NICs, regardless of the bus type, I assume this needs to
> chase it or VPD might disappear on e1000/e100 if it currently exists.
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
