On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 01:44:57PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:14:44PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:13:59PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > On ARM64 PROBE_ONLY PCI systems resources are not currently claimed,
> > > > therefore they can't be enabled since they do not have a valid
> > > > parent pointer; this in turn prevents enabling PCI devices on
> > > > ARM64 PROBE_ONLY systems, causing PCI devices initialization to
> > > > fail.
> > >
> > > Where does arm64 claim PCI BAR resources for the non-PROBE_ONLY case?
> >
> > arm64 (and arm) does not claim resources in arch code, they are always
> > assigned in the respective host controllers (or the pcibios on arm),
> > except for the PCI generic host when in PROBE_ONLY mode, where resources
> > are neither claimed nor assigned (the reason for this patch to exist).
> > ...
> >
> > > I know it must be there somewhere, but I don't see it.
> >
> > It is not there, it is done in the host controllers by assigning the
> > resources (which also "claim" them by assigning the parent pointer).
>
> The host controller drivers should claim the apertures forwarded to
> the PCI bus. For pci-host-generic, this happens when
> gen_pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() calls devm_request_resource().
Yes, the generic host claims the apertures at DT probing time.
> But that doesn't do anything for the BARs of the PCI devices
> themselves, of course.
>
> If this patch fixes a problem that will occur in the future, when we
> add arm/arm64 code to claim BARs, let's make this patch part of that
> series. If it fixes a problem in the current tree, I'll merge it now,
> but so far I haven't been able to make the connection between this
> patch and a problem in the current code.
It fixes a problem in the current tree (I mean when the PCI pull is
merged - it contains code that enables PCI host generic on arm64),
since without it PROBE_ONLY systems (ie PCI host generic on kvmtool) would
try to enable resources and fail, since the resources were not claimed.
It works the same way as arm, I will rework both arches when I am done
refactoring the resource claiming implementation.
Will picked it up already I do not know what's the best way to
merge it I guess it can go via the arm64 tree if you do not have any
objections.
Thank you !
Lorenzo
> > > > To solve this issue, resources must be claimed when devices are
> > > > added on PROBE_ONLY systems, which ensures that the resource hierarchy
> > > > is validated and the resource tree is sane, but this requires changes
> > > > in the ARM64 resource management that can affect adversely existing
> > > > PCI set-ups (claiming resources on !PROBE_ONLY systems might break
> > > > existing ARM64 PCI platform implementations).
> > > >
> > > > As a temporary solution in preparation for a proper resources claiming
> > > > implementation in ARM64 core, to enable PCI PROBE_ONLY systems on ARM64,
> > > > this patch adds a pcibios_enable_device() arch implementation that
> > > > simply prevents enabling resources on PROBE_ONLY systems (mirroring ARM
> > > > behaviour).
> > > >
> > > > This is always a safe thing to do because on PROBE_ONLY systems the
> > > > configuration space set-up can be considered immutable, and it is in
> > > > preparation of proper resource claiming that would finally validate
> > > > the PCI resources tree in the ARM64 arch implementation on PROBE_ONLY
> > > > systems.
> > > >
> > > > For !PROBE_ONLY systems resources enablement in pcibios_enable_device()
> > > > on ARM64 is implemented as in current PCI core, leaving the behaviour
> > > > unchanged.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Bjorn, all,
> > > >
> > > > as I mention in the commit log, this patch is a temporary solution
> > > > in preparation for proper resources claiming in ARM64, so that
> > > > we can safely enable the PCI generic host controller on ARM64 systems.
> > > >
> > > > It mirrors ARM implementation and I will work on changing both
> > > > ARM and ARM64 to convert them to proper resources claiming in
> > > > the respective implementations.
> > > >
> > > > Lorenzo
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > index 4095379..b3d098b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > @@ -38,6 +38,19 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> > > > return res->start;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * pcibios_enable_device - Enable I/O and memory.
> > > > + * @dev: PCI device to be enabled
> > > > + * @mask: bitmask of BARs to enable
> > > > + */
> > > > +int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + return pci_enable_resources(dev, mask);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
> > > > */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.2.1
> > > >
> > >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
