On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 21/07/15 22:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:16:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> In order to be able to populate the device msi_domain field,
>>> add the necesary hooks to propagate the host bridge msi_domain
>>> across secondary busses to devices.
>>>
>>> So far, nobody populates the initial msi_domain.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> index cefd636..376f6fa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> @@ -661,6 +661,20 @@ static void pci_set_bus_speed(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void __weak pcibios_set_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>
>> I don't think there's anything in this series that requires this to be a
>> weak function, is there? This is the only definition I see.
>
> It looks like all the pcibios_* functions so far have a weak attribute,
> and I've added it as a matter of consistency.
We've used pcibios_* names where we might need an arch-specific
implementation. I'm not sure that's the case here -- do you envision
an implementation under arch/* someday? If not, maybe it should just
be a pci_* function instead of pcibios_*.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
