Re: [PATCH 1/1] pci-imx6: add speed change timeout message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/12/2015 1:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Troy,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:37:44PM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote:
>> Currently, the timeout is never detected as count
>> has a value of -1 if a timeout happens, but the code is checking
>> for 0. Also, this patch removes the unneeded final wait
>> if a timeout occurs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>> index fdb9536..51be92c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>> @@ -398,20 +398,22 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	writel(tmp, pp->dbi_base + PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>>  
>>  	count = 200;
>> -	while (count--) {
>> +	while (1) {
>>  		tmp = readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>>  		/* Test if the speed change finished. */
>> -		if (!(tmp & PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE))
>> +		if (!(tmp & PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE)) {
>> +			/* Make sure link training is finished as well! */
>> +			ret = imx6_pcie_wait_for_link(pp);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +		if (count-- == 0) {
>> +			dev_err(pp->dev, "Speed change timeout\n");
>> +			ret = -EINVAL;
>>  			break;
>> +		}
>>  		usleep_range(100, 1000);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	/* Make sure link training is finished as well! */
>> -	if (count)
>> -		ret = imx6_pcie_wait_for_link(pp);
>> -	else
>> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>> -
>>  	if (ret) {
>>  		dev_err(pp->dev, "Failed to bring link up!\n");
>>  	} else {
> 
> This looks fine functionally, but I propose the following slight
> rearrangement because I have another patch that makes all the
> "wait_for_link" timeout loops look similar, and this loop might as
> well be similar, too.
> 
> Unrelated to your patch, but noticed while doing this: what's the magic
> constant 0x80 here?
> 
> +	tmp = readl(pp->dbi_base + 0x80);
> 
> Is that correct?  Can we add a symbolic name for it?
> 
> Bjorn
> 

The name in the manual for +x80 is
PCIE_RC_LCSR - Link Control and Status Register

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux