Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] pci: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/02/2015 10:04 AM, Mark D Rustad wrote:
Add a dev_flags bit, PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0, to access VPD through
function 0 to provide VPD access on other functions. This solves
concurrent access problems on many devices without changing the
attributes exposed in sysfs. Never set this bit on funciton 0 or
there will be an infinite recursion.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/pci/access.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  include/linux/pci.h  |    2 ++
  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index d9b64a175990..e435c087c354 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -439,6 +439,40 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_pci22_ops = {
  	.release = pci_vpd_pci22_release,
  };
+static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
+			       void *arg)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	if (!tdev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = pci_read_vpd(tdev, pos, count, arg);
+	pci_dev_put(tdev);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
+				const void *arg)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	if (!tdev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = pci_write_vpd(tdev, pos, count, arg);
+	pci_dev_put(tdev);
+	return ret;
+}
+

I'm pretty sure these could cause some serious errors if you direct assign the device into a VM since you then end up with multiple devices sharing a bus. Also it would likely have side-effects on a LOM (Lan On Motherboard) as it also shares the bus with multiple non-Ethernet devices.

I believe you still need to add something like a check for !pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus) before you attempt to grab function 0. It probably also wouldn't hurt to check the dev->multifunction bit before running this code since it wouldn't make sense to go chasing down the VPD on another function if the device doesn't have one. You could probably do that either as a part of this code, or perhaps put it in the quirk.

- Alex

- Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux