> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [-cc Venkatesh (bouncing) > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks! Who's tree should this go through? > > > > I don't know. This is the only patch that went to linux-pci, so I > > haven't seen the rest. > > Oh I only rev'd a v5 for 1/5 as that's the only one that had feedback > asking for changes. > > Patch v4 2/5 was for "lib: devres: add pcim_iomap_wc() variants", you > had questions about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and the fact that this is not > yet used. I replied. This patch can then be ignored but again, I'd > hate for folks to go in and try to add a non EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() > symbol of this. > > Patches v4 3-5 remain intact, I had addressed it to you, but failed to > Cc linux-pci, I'll go ahead and bounce those now. > > Just today Dave Arlie provided a Reviewed-by to some simple > framebuffer device driver changes. I wonder if these changes should go > through the framebuffer tree provided you already gave the Acked-by > for the PCI parts, or if the PCI parts should go in first and only > later (I guess we'd have to wait) then intake the driver changes that > use the symbol. > > What we decide should likely also apply to the series that adds > pci_ioremap_wc_bar() and makes use of it on drivers. > > Dave, Tomi, any preference? > Maybe send Bjorn a pull request with a tree with the pci changes, and the fb changes reviewed-by me and acked by Tomi. Seems like it could be the simplest path forward. Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
