Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] pci: Add Cavium PCI vendor id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:35:20 -0500
>
>> [+cc Greg]
>>
>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:14 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:49:40 -0500
>>>
>>>> Hi Aleksey,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Aleksey Makarov
>>>> <aleksey.makarov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 ++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>>>>> index e63c02a..3633cc6 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>>>>> @@ -2327,6 +2327,8 @@
>>>>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ALTIMA_AC9100    0x03ea
>>>>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ALTIMA_AC1003    0x03eb
>>>>>
>>>>> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CAVIUM           0x177d
>>>>
>>>> Please read the note at the top of include/linux/pci_ids.h.  If this
>>>> definition is used in two or more drivers, mention that in the
>>>> changelog.  Otherwise, just use the bare hex value or a private
>>>> #define in your driver.
>>>
>>> It is referenced from two foo.c files in the same driver.
>>>
>>> I don't know what policy we want for situations like that.
>>
>> The current policy (1d4a433fc4e9 ("PCI: Document pci_ids.h addition
>> policy.")) predates me and I don't know the whole rationale.  I can
>> see that it might reduce backporting pain for distros.
>>
>> If two foo.c files in the same driver share the PCI ID, they likely
>> share other things as well, so there's likely a shared .h file where a
>> private PCI_VENDOR_ID_CAVIUM could go.
>>
>> But this is a vendor ID (not a device ID), and it seems likely that
>> there will be other devices from Cavium, so maybe it would make sense
>> to apply the policy to device IDs, and go ahead and add vendor IDs to
>> pci_ids.h.
>
> That makes sense to me, and therefore this change is probably fine as-is.

OK.  I assume you'll take the whole series, so:

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux