On 2015/5/13 21:25, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年05月13日 20:24, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/5/13 17:29, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Hi Jiang,
>>>
>>> On 2015年05月05日 10:46, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>
>>> struct pci_controller {
>>> struct acpi_device *companion;
>>> void *iommu;
>>> int segment;
>>> int node; /* nearest node with memory or
>>> NUMA_NO_NODE for global allocation */
>>>
>>> void *platform_data;
>>> };
>>>
>>> except void *platform_data;
>>>
>>> On ARM64, the structure is almost the same, so how about
>>> introduce
>>>
>>> struct pci_controller {
>>> struct acpi_device *companion; /* ACPI companion device */
>>> void *iommu; /* IOMMU private data */
>>> int segment; /* PCI domain */
>>> int node; /* NUMA node */
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
>>> void *platform_data;
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>>
>>> in this file, then can be used for all architectures?
>> Current mode is that architecture defines its own version of
>> struct pci_controller. It would be better to keep this pattern.
>
> OK, thanks for the clarify :) So how about add my basic
> PCI support patch for ARM64 on top of you patch set to fix
> this problem?
Sure, please send me the patches and I will send out v3 to
cover your review comments.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
